Knowledge Base · EU · General
General information, not legal advice. · Reviewed 2026-07-12
Regulation reference: Regulation (EU) 2025/40
Most compliance failures under the EU's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) don't start in a customs warehouse or a marketplace listing review. They start earlier — at the moment an importer places an order without ever asking the factory what the shipment will actually be packed in. By the time goods arrive on oversized pallets wrapped in raw wood, or in cartons too weak to survive transit, the damage is done: crushed freight, rejected wood packaging at the border, mislabeled cartons, and a compliance gap that is now the importer's problem to fix.
With PPWR obligations phasing in and EPR registration requirements tightening alongside, the packaging conversation can no longer happen after production starts. It needs to happen before the purchase order is confirmed, in writing, with the supplier's sign-off.
A packaging specification sheet only works if the supplier treats it as binding. A loosely worded email asking for "compliant packaging" invites interpretation — factories default to whatever is cheapest unless requirements are explicit, measurable, and tied to consequences. Structure it in three sections:
Two failures recur even with a thorough sheet: stretch-wrap thinness (a supplier using cheap, thin film instead of the specified gauge and layer count, so loads shift in transit) and vague handling of mixed-SKU pallets (inner boxes not clearly separated and marked, slowing receiving to a crawl). Both are cheap to prevent in the form and expensive to fix afterwards.
Packaging compliance is a sourcing decision, not a shipping-department problem to solve after goods arrive. A structured, penalty-backed spec sheet — reviewed and signed off before the PO is confirmed — shifts the burden of getting it right onto the party best positioned to control it: the supplier packing the box.