This tool shows public California Proposition 65 notice records and automated matches based on them. It does not determine legal compliance or violation, and it is not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney.

Prop 65 Notice Checker

Search California Prop 65 notices.

Free, public-record lookup for sellers, importers, and compliance teams — updated daily from official filings.

Search by brand name, product category, or chemical to see recent filings. Every result is a public 60-day-notice record we mirror daily from official California Attorney General filings — no account required.

5,687 stored notices Latest filing: 2026-08-25 Official source: oag.ca.gov (California Attorney General)

158 result(s) · page 4/4

AG numberDate filedAlleged violators ChemicalProductNoticing party (plaintiff)
2025-04411 2025-10-20 Hang Tai Marine Products Co.; T&T Ginseng, Inc. Cadmium and cadmium compounds, Lead and lead compounds Dried Squid Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 notice(s) on record
Reuben Yeroushalmi
2025-04413 2025-10-20 Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce; Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory Limited; Khon Guan Corporation; Walmart, Inc.; Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC Cadmium and cadmium compounds, Lead and lead compounds Shrimp Sauce Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 notice(s) on record
Reuben Yeroushalmi
2025-04414 2025-10-20 Mona B LLC; IHF Limited Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) ID Wallet Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 notice(s) on record
Reuben Yeroushalmi
2025-04415 2025-10-20 Purse Seine Holdings LLC; The Von Companies, Inc.; Albertsons Companies, Inc.; Pavillions Cadmium and cadmium compounds Mackerel in Extra Virgin Olive Oil with Piri-Piri Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 notice(s) on record
Reuben Yeroushalmi
2025-04416 2025-10-20 Shenzhen Mengda International Trading Co. Ltd; Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon.com Services, LLC; Amazon.com Sales, Inc. Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) Organizing Pouch Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 notice(s) on record
Reuben Yeroushalmi
2025-04417 2025-10-20 Transocean Resources Management, Inc. dba Yamibuy Lead and lead compounds Dried Seaweed Knots Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 notice(s) on record
Reuben Yeroushalmi
2025-04418 2025-10-20 L.A. Girl LLC Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) Swimsuits with Tote Bags Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 notice(s) on record
Reuben Yeroushalmi
2025-04419 2025-10-20 May C. Kayla Inc. dba XB Handbags Diisononyl phthalate (DINP) Crossbody Bag with PVC Components Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 notice(s) on record
Reuben Yeroushalmi
← Previous 4 / 4
Do your names appear in these results?

The globalEPR.ai platform automatically screens every new filing against your full brand, importer, and supplier list — and alerts you inside the action window.

Request access

See which chemicals and categories are being cited most.

A rolling view of recent filing activity by chemical and product type — useful context, not a risk score.

Filings in the last 180 days, grouped by chemical × product category

Food & supplementsCookware & tablewareCosmetics & personal careApparel & accessoriesToys & childrenElectronicsHome & furnitureAutomotiveTools & Home ImprovementJewelryOther
Lead 1035 216 13 24 6 20 45 7 9 7 335
Cadmium 145 13 2 3 4 6 6 · · 4 73
Phthalates 16 7 11 69 4 4 14 10 9 1 60
PFOA / PFAS 21 6 1 9 1 7 1 2 · · 29
Acrylamide · · · · · · · · · · ·
BPA / BPS 2 4 1 · · · 1 · · · 25
Arsenic 1 · · · · · · · · 1 1
Mercury 3 · 2 · · · · · · · ·
Chromium (VI) 1 · 2 45 2 · · · · · 19
Other 118 6 26 · · · 2 2 · · 95

Notices per month (last 12 months)

311
404
512
445
518
492
629
519
621
440
0
0
25-1125-1226-0126-0226-0326-0426-0526-0626-0726-0826-0926-10

Which parties file the most notices?

A rolling tally of 60-day notices by noticing party, built from the same public filing records shown above. Filing counts are factual public-record statistics — they are not an evaluation of any notice or party.

63 noticing parties filed at least one notice in the last 365 days. Close name variants (punctuation and legal suffixes such as ", Inc.") are grouped; every group lists the exact recorded names it includes, so the grouping stays conservative and transparent.

Where each party's filings concentrate (product categories, last 365 days)

Noticing party Notices Food & supplementsCookware & tablewareCosmetics & personal careApparel & accessoriesToys & childrenElectronicsHome & furnitureAutomotiveTools & Home ImprovementJewelryOther
Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. 1,772 759 163 87 26 12 22 44 6 2 10 641
CalSafe Research Center, Inc. 761 581 16 2 12 · 7 2 3 · 6 132
Clean Product Advocates, LLC 464 282 15 3 4 5 8 27 2 · 1 117
Ecological Alliance, LLC 261 23 20 6 53 1 15 33 13 8 · 89
Ema Bell 215 48 36 3 47 2 · 23 5 2 2 47
Gabriel Espinoza 214 83 39 2 28 2 1 9 1 · · 49
Precila Balabbo 197 55 41 2 38 3 · 8 2 6 · 42
Dennis Johnson 166 17 102 · 7 1 8 11 · 1 · 19
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. 158 81 1 3 14 · · 3 3 · 3 50
Center for Consumer Safety, LLC 143 124 · 1 7 · · · · · · 11
Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. — 1,772 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (709), Cadmium (392), Other (334), BPA / BPS (311), Phthalates (24)

Recorded names in this group: Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. · Environmental Health Advocates

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

CalSafe Research Center, Inc. — 761 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (741), BPA / BPS (13), PFOA / PFAS (7)

Recorded names in this group: CalSafe Research Center, Inc. · Calsafe Research Center, Inc.

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Clean Product Advocates, LLC — 464 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (427), Cadmium (37)

Recorded names in this group: Clean Product Advocates, LLC

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Ecological Alliance, LLC — 261 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: PFOA / PFAS (150), Phthalates (100), Lead (11)

Recorded names in this group: Ecological Alliance, LLC

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Ema Bell — 215 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (128), Chromium (VI) (44), Phthalates (36), Cadmium (5), Other (1)

Recorded names in this group: Ema Bell

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Gabriel Espinoza — 214 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (161), Phthalates (24), Chromium (VI) (21), BPA / BPS (3), Cadmium (3)

Recorded names in this group: Gabriel Espinoza

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Precila Balabbo — 197 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (128), Phthalates (38), Chromium (VI) (27), BPA / BPS (3), Cadmium (1)

Recorded names in this group: Precila Balabbo

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Dennis Johnson — 166 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (139), Phthalates (27)

Recorded names in this group: Dennis Johnson

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. — 158 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (77), Phthalates (43), Cadmium (38)

Recorded names in this group: Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Center for Consumer Safety, LLC — 143 result(s)

Most-cited chemicals: Lead (133), Other (6), Cadmium (4)

Recorded names in this group: Center for Consumer Safety, LLC · Center for Consumer Safety

Search this party's notices → · Track this party in your watchlist ↓

Getting suspicious buyer messages?

Test purchases ahead of a formal notice are a documented practice — these are the traits worth watching for in any pre-purchase inquiry:

  • Names a specific listed chemical (e.g. DEHP, lead, cadmium) and connects it correctly to your product's material
  • Asks for documents — SDS/MSDS sheets, factory material declarations, or lab test reports
  • Uses supply-chain vocabulary: HS customs codes, import records, country of manufacture
  • Sympathy framing ("I have a baby at home") that encourages a fast, unguarded reply
  • Two-step escalation: a soft opening question, then a technical follow-up once you engage

Keep in mind: marketplace message threads are permanent written records, and statements about chemical composition are significant factual claims. This tool cannot determine any sender's intent and does not provide legal advice.

Read the full case breakdown: anatomy of a hook email →

Set up free tracking for your brand names ↓

Get notified when a new notice may involve you.

Add the brand names, company names, Amazon shop names, or product name keywords you want tracked. We'll email you when a filing appears to reference them — you decide what to do next.

Notices filed against Amazon rather than the seller often name only the product description — tracking your product name covers those filings.

You'll be alerted when this party files a new 60-day notice — whichever business the notice names.

Up to 5 names in total across the five fields.

By signing up, you'll receive periodic emails when a filed notice appears to reference the names or categories you've listed. Matches are generated automatically and may include errors — please verify any match against the original filing.

Frequently asked questions

What is a Prop 65 "60-day notice" and who can send one?
A 60-day notice is the formal document that must be served on a business and on public enforcers before a private Proposition 65 lawsuit can be filed. Besides the California Attorney General, any private individual or law firm ("private enforcer") can serve one. Every notice is filed in the California Attorney General's public database — the same database this tool mirrors.
A buyer is asking me for SDS sheets, test reports, and about specific chemicals — is that normal?
Ordinary consumer inquiries rarely name safety data sheets (SDS), HS customs codes, or specific listed chemicals. In publicly reported seller cases, messages with these traits have sometimes preceded formal notices. This tool cannot determine any sender's intent — it only shows public filing records, which you can search above to see activity in your product category.
Does adding a Prop 65 warning "just in case" settle the question?
Not necessarily. Prop 65 warning obligations turn on whether a product actually causes exposure to a listed chemical, which is normally a question answered by test data. California's regulator (OEHHA) has also publicly discouraged unsupported "over-warning". Whether a warning is required, and how it should be worded, is a question to resolve with test results and professional advice.
How should I reply to a message like this?
We can't advise on individual situations. What can be said factually: marketplace threads are written records; statements about chemical composition are factual claims that most sellers have no batch-level test data to support either way; marketplaces publish their own response-time rules; and questions about legal exposure are the territory of a licensed attorney.
How do I find out whether my brand or company has been named in a notice?
Type your brand, company, or shop name into the search box at the top of this page to check filed public notices. You can also create a free watchlist below — we'll email you when a new filing appears to reference a name you've registered.
Can I stop professional filers from targeting me?
No — private enforcement with a penalty share is built into Proposition 65 by design, so professional filers will exist as long as the law does. What a seller controls is how attractive a target they are. Four things recur in publicly reported outcomes: (1) have supplier material declarations and accredited-lab test reports on file before anyone asks; (2) warn correctly where a warning is required (a compliant short-form warning removes the core theory of a claim); (3) never speculate about product composition in writing — composition questions are answered by test data; (4) watch the public filing record with a free watchlist so you learn of a filing while the notice window is open. This is general information, not legal advice; settlement and defense questions are the territory of a licensed attorney.
Why would I track a specific noticing party ("repeat filer")?
The public filing record shows that many noticing parties file in campaigns: dozens or hundreds of notices over a few months, concentrated on the same chemical and product category — first one product that tested positive, then similar products across the marketplace. A new filing by a party you watch, against a product similar to yours, is therefore a publicly visible early signal that your category is in an active filing wave. Seeing that signal before a notice arrives leaves time to request supplier declarations, arrange testing, or review labelling — instead of first learning about it after a formal notice is served. The watchlist only relays public filing records; it is not legal advice.

Global Agentic Holdings Limited (globalEPR.ai) is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice, compliance determinations, or attorney referrals. All notice data originates from public California Attorney General and OEHHA records; see original filings for authoritative detail.